On Participation in Political Protest Movements
- 1 April 1974
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
- Vol. 10 (2) , 181-207
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002188637401000206
Abstract
Laymen and social scientists alike often believe that people are inspired to participate in political or social movements because of certain dislocating or frustrating personal experiences. The political protests of recent years have been interpreted in terms of similar ideas and formalized in five currently popular theories on the origins of political protest: status inconsistency, cumulative deprivation, relative deprivation, rising expectations, and social isolation. I review a large body of empirical evidence concerning each theory and find, at best, only limited support for them. Next I present some general reasons why the theories may be either inadequate or only partially correct. And, finally, I suggest a novel approach to the explanation and prediction of participation in political movements, portrayed in the form of a path-analytic scheme which can be employed in future empirical research.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Political Trust and Racial IdeologyAmerican Political Science Review, 1970
- The Mistrustful-Efficacious Hypothesis and Political ParticipationThe Journal of Politics, 1970
- Internal‐External Control and Black Militancy1Journal of Social Issues, 1970
- Continuity and Change in American Politics: Parties and Issues in the 1968 ElectionAmerican Political Science Review, 1969
- Continuities in Theories of Status Consistency and Cognitive DissonanceSocial Forces, 1967
- The Liberated Generation: An Exploration of the Roots of Student Protest1Journal of Social Issues, 1967
- The Identification Problem and Theory Building: The Case of Status InconsistencyAmerican Sociological Review, 1966
- Social Structure and the Negro Revolt: An Examination of Some HypothesesSocial Forces, 1964
- Toward a Theory of RevolutionAmerican Sociological Review, 1962
- Frustration and aggression.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1939