Conventionality in Distant Simultaneity
- 1 June 1967
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Philosophy of Science
- Vol. 34 (2) , 116-136
- https://doi.org/10.1086/288136
Abstract
In his original paper of 1905, “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies”, Einstein described a procedure for synchronizing distant clocks at rest in any inertial system K. Clocks thus synchronized may be said to be in standard signal synchrony in K. It has often been claimed that there are no logical or physical reasons for preferring standard signal synchronizations to any of a range of possible non-standard ones. In this paper, the range of consistent non-standard signal synchronizations, first for any one inertial system, and second for any set of such systems, is investigated, and it is shown that the requirement of consistency leaves much less room for choice than is commonly supposed. Nevertheless consistent non-standard signal synchronizations appear to be possible. However, it is also shown that good physical reasons for preferring standard signal synchronizations exist, if the Special Theory of Relativity yields correct predictions.The thesis of the conventionality of distant simultaneity espoused particularly by Reichenbach and Grünbaum is thus either trivialized or refuted.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- ORIGIN AND CONCEPT OF RELATIVITY (I)The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1965
- Whitehead's Philosophy of ScienceThe Philosophical Review, 1962
- Relativity of Simultaneity within a Single Galilean Frame: A RejoinderAmerican Journal of Physics, 1956
- Planetenuhr und Einsteinsche GleichzeitigkeitThe European Physical Journal A, 1925
- Relativitätstheorie und ErkenntnislehrePublished by Springer Nature ,1923
- The Meaning of RelativityPublished by Springer Nature ,1922
- EinleitungPublished by Springer Nature ,1921
- Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter KörperAnnalen der Physik, 1905