Deep Sedation With Propofol by Nonanesthesiologists
Open Access
- 1 November 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
- Vol. 157 (11) , 1097-1103
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.157.11.1097
Abstract
Background The need to perform procedural sedation for children has increased in recent years, and so has the experience of nonanesthesiologists in this field. The use of propofol increases the success of satisfactory deep sedation, but it can produce rapid and profound decreases in level of consciousness and cardiorespiratory function. Data are needed to assess the safety of this drug outside an anesthesiology setting. Objective To assess safety and efficacy of procedural sedation with propofol in a pediatric ward of a tertiary-care pediatric teaching hospital with trained personnel and monitoring facilities. Methods Patients admitted to the hospital who needed invasive procedures underwent procedural sedation by the pediatric sedation unit with intravenous propofol. A training protocol was developed to educate nurses and residents. Results We performed 1059 procedures. Sedation was achieved in all procedures, and all but 1 were successfully performed. No patient required intubation. Transient desaturation resolving spontaneously occurred in 134 (12.7%) of 1059 patients. Major desaturation requiring a short course of ventilation occurred in 4 (0.8%) of 483 patients undergoing upper endoscopies, in 1 (0.3%) of 287 patients undergoing painful procedures, and in none of the 289 patients undergoing colonoscopies. Laryngospasm occurred in 10 (2.1%) of 483 patients undergoing upper endoscopies. Conclusions In this experience, the use of propofol with concurrent oxygen administration allowed sedations in children with no significant complications for colonoscopies and painful procedures. Complications in the group of upper endoscopies appear too high for recommending propofol in a sedation unit with residents in attendance. This protocol of procedural sedation by nonanesthesiologists allowed a significant increase in the number of procedures performed with sedation and saved anesthesiology resources.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pediatric sedation for procedures titrated to a desired degree of immobility results in unpredictable depth of sedationPediatric Emergency Care, 2001
- Prospective Evaluation of Propofol Anesthesia in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit for Elective Oncology Procedures in Ambulatory and Hospitalized ChildrenPediatrics, 2000
- Sedation and Analgesia for Procedures in ChildrenNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Adverse events of procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency departmentAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1999
- A Clinical Trial of Propofol vs Midazolam for Procedural Sedation in a Pediatric Emergency DepartmentAcademic Emergency Medicine, 1999
- Propofol for Emergency Department Procedural Sedation—Not Yet Ready for Prime TimeAcademic Emergency Medicine, 1999
- Development of a nurse-led sedation service for paediatric magnetic resonance imagingThe Lancet, 1999
- Propofol Anesthesia for Invasive Procedures in Ambulatory and Hospitalized Children: Experience in the Pediatric Intensive Care UnitPediatrics, 1999
- Pediatric sedation with analgesiaThe American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 1999
- The Pediatric Sedation Unit: A Mechanism for Pediatric SedationPediatrics, 1998