Blunt Bowel and Mesenteric Injuries: The Role of Screening Computed Tomography

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Early generation scanners have demonstrated poor sensitivity detecting blunt bowel/mesenteric injuries (BBMI). This study was aimed at determining the accuracy and role of helical scanners in BBMI. Retrospective chart review of patients with BBMI, or computed tomographic scans suspicious of BBMI, from August of 1995 to December of 1998. One hundred of 8,112 scans (1.2%) were suspicious of BBMI. Of these suspicious scans, 53 patients had BBMI (true positive-TP) and 47 patients did not (false positive-FP). Seven patients with negative scans had BBMI (false negative-FN). Computed tomography contributed toward early surgery in 77% of patients who may have been delayed. Six patients developed intra-abdominal abscess. The abscess group had a significantly longer time interval from injury to surgery. Multiple findings were seen in 57% of true positive scans, whereas in 13% of false positive scans (p < 0.0001). An algorithm for management of BBMI is presented. Helical scanners have high accuracy in detecting BBMI. Single versus multiple findings are useful in managing these injuries.