Chromosomal beta-lactamase expression and resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics in Proteus vulgaris and Morganella morganii
- 1 September 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 32 (9) , 1385-1391
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.32.9.1385
Abstract
Indole-positive members of the Proteeae usually have inducible expression of chromosomal beta-lactamases. Mutants with stably derepressed beta-lactamase expression occur in inducible populations at frequencies in the range of 10(-6) to 10(-8). The contribution of these beta-lactamases to drug resistance was examined in Morganella morganii and Proteus vulgaris. The M. morganii enzyme was a high-molecular-weight (49,000) class I cephalosporinase with low Vmax rates for ampicillin, carbenicillin, and and broad-spectrum cephalosporins. The P. vulgaris enzyme had a lower molecular weight (32,000) and high Vmax rates for ampicillin, cephaloridine, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone. Imipenem and cefoxitin inactivated the P. vulgaris enzyme but were low-Vmax, low-Km substrates for that of M. morganii. Despite these differences, the two beta-lactamases caused similar resistance profiles. Ampicillin and cephaloridine were strong inducers for both species, and beta-lactamase-inducible strains and their stably derepressed mutants were resistant, whereas basal mutants (those with low-level uninducible beta-lactamase) were susceptible to these two compounds. Mezlocillin, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and (usually) carbenicillin were almost equally active against beta-lactamase-inducible organisms and their basal mutants, but were less active against stably derepressed mutants. This behavior reflected the beta-lactamase lability of these drugs, coupled with their weak inducer activity below the MIC. Carbenicillin was a labile strong inducer for a single P. vulgaris strain, and inducible enzyme was protective against the drug in this atypical organism. Cefoxitin and imipenem, both strong inducers below the MIC, were almost equally active against beta-lactamase-inducible organisms and their basal and stably derepressed mutants.This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chromosomal -lactamase expression and antibiotic resistance in Enterobacter cloacaeJournal of Medical Microbiology, 1988
- Emergence of resistance in gram-negative bacteria during therapy with expanded-spectrum cephalosporinsEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1987
- Clinical significance of beta-lactamase induction and stable derepression in gram-negative rodsEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1987
- Inducible Type I βlactamases of Gram-negative bacteria and resistance to βlactam antibioticsJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1986
- Inducible β-Lactamases are Principally Responsible for the Naturally Occurring Resistance towards β-Lactam Antibiotics in Proteus vulgarisChemotherapy, 1986
- Do β-lactamases ‘trap’ cephalosporins?Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1985
- Emergence of Resistance During Therapy with the Newer -Lactam Antibiotics: Role of Inducible -Lactamases and Implications for the FutureClinical Infectious Diseases, 1983
- Purification and Some Properties of a Cephalosporinase from Proteus vulgarisAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1981
- The β-lactamases of Gram-negative bacteria and their rôle in resistance to β-lactam antibioticsJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1976
- The Use of Analytical Isoelectric Focusing for Detection and Identification of -LactamasesJournal of General Microbiology, 1975