Theories of the origin of the solar system 1956- 1985

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Attempts to find a plausible naturalistic explanation of the origin of the solar system began about 350 years ago but have not yet been quantitatively successful. The period 1956- 1985 includes the first phase of intensive space research; new results from lunar and planetary exploration might be expected to have played a major role in the development of ideas about lunar and planetary formation. While this is indeed the case for theories of the origin of the moon (selenogony), it was not true for the solar system in general, where ground-based observations (including meteorite studies) were frequently more decisive. During this period most theorists accepted a monistic scenario: the collapse of a gas-dust cloud to form the sun with surrounding disk, and condensation of that disk to form planets, were seen as part of a single process. Theorists differed on how to explain the distribution of angular momentum between sun and planets, on whether planets formed directly by condensation of gaseous protoplanets or by accretion of solid planetesimals, on whether the "solar nebula" was ever hot and turbulent enough to vaporize and completely mix its components, and on whether an external cause such as a supernova explosion "triggered" the initial collapse of the cloud. Only in selenogony was a tentative consensus reached on a single working hypothesis with quantitative results.

This publication has 464 references indexed in Scilit: