The Origins of Eukaryotic Gene Structure
Open Access
- 9 November 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Vol. 23 (2) , 450-468
- https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msj050
Abstract
Most of the phenotypic diversity that we perceive in the natural world is directly attributable to the peculiar structure of the eukaryotic gene, which harbors numerous embellishments relative to the situation in prokaryotes. The most profound changes include introns that must be spliced out of precursor mRNAs, transcribed but untranslated leader and trailer sequences (untranslated regions), modular regulatory elements that drive patterns of gene expression, and expansive intergenic regions that harbor additional diffuse control mechanisms. Explaining the origins of these features is difficult because they each impose an intrinsic disadvantage by increasing the genic mutation rate to defective alleles. To address these issues, a general hypothesis for the emergence of eukaryotic gene structure is provided here. Extensive information on absolute population sizes, recombination rates, and mutation rates strongly supports the view that eukaryotes have reduced genetic effective population sizes relative to prokaryotes, with especially extreme reductions being the rule in multicellular lineages. The resultant increase in the power of random genetic drift appears to be sufficient to overwhelm the weak mutational disadvantages associated with most novel aspects of the eukaryotic gene, supporting the idea that most such changes are simple outcomes of semi-neutral processes rather than direct products of natural selection. However, by establishing an essentially permanent change in the population-genetic environment permissive to the genome-wide repatterning of gene structure, the eukaryotic condition also promoted a reliable resource from which natural selection could secondarily build novel forms of organismal complexity. Under this hypothesis, arguments based on molecular, cellular, and/or physiological constraints are insufficient to explain the disparities in gene, genomic, and phenotypic complexity between prokaryotes and eukaryotes.Keywords
This publication has 170 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intragenic codon bias in a set of mouse and human genesJournal of Theoretical Biology, 2004
- High mutation rate and predominance of insertions in the Caenorhabditis elegans nuclear genomeNature, 2004
- Patterns of Evolutionary Constraints in Intronic and Intergenic DNA of DrosophilaGenome Research, 2004
- A Neutral Explanation for the Correlation of Diversity with Recombination Rates in HumansAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2003
- Tracing the Evolutionary History of Drosophila Regulatory Regions with Models that Identify Transcription Factor Binding SitesMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2003
- ANALYSIS ANDFUNCTION OFTRANSCRIPTIONALREGULATORYELEMENTS: Insights fromDrosophilaAnnual Review of Entomology, 2003
- Splitting pairs: the diverging fates of duplicated genesNature Reviews Genetics, 2002
- Hypothesis: The Rate and Scale of Dispersal of Freshwater Diatom Species is a Function of their Global AbundanceProtist, 2002
- Coevolution in bicoid‐dependent promoters and the inception of regulatory incompatibilities among species of higher DipteraEvolution & Development, 2002
- Mutational pressure as the main cause of molecular evolution and polymorphismNature, 1974