Randomized comparison of the effects of endocervical and vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel in women with various degrees of cervical ripeness
- 31 December 1995
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 173 (6) , 1859-1864
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(95)90441-7
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- 6 Therapeutic uses of prostaglandinsBailliere's Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1992
- Induction of labor by prostaglandin E2: intracervical gel or vaginal pessaries?European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1991
- A randomized, double-blind trial of prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening and meta-analysisAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1991
- Intrauterine pressures in labours induced by amniotomy and oxytocin or vaginal prostaglandin gel compared with spontaneous labourBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1991
- The efficiency of prostaglandin E2 vaginal suppositories versus intracervical prostaglandin gel for induction of labor in patients with unfavorable inducibility prospectsEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1988
- Intracervical versus intravaginal PGE2 for induction of labor at term in patients with an unfavorable cervixArchiv für Gynäkologie, 1985
- Endocervical prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical softeningProstaglandins, 1984
- Intravaginal versus intracervical application of prostaglandin E2 in viscous gel for cervical priming and induction of labor at term in patients with an unfavorable cervical stateAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1983