Perceived Representativess and Voting: An Assessment of the Impact of “Choices” vs. “Echoes”
- 1 March 1985
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 79 (1) , 50-61
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1956118
Abstract
The persistent decline in voting in presidential elections since 1960 has resulted in serious scholarly attention being given to nonvoting. Despite the quality of these studies, however, the ratio of what we know about nonvoting to what we do not know is rather low. In the hopes of improving this situation, I advance the hypothesis that one reason that individuals do not vote is that their interests are not represented by any of the major candidates. To test this hypothesis, I used the SRC election studies (1968-1980) to construct measures of individuals' perceived distance from the major candidates on a variety of issues. Net of an extensive set of factors usually invoked to explain participation, increased distance from candidates significantly decreases the probability of voting. The implications of these results are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Political Parties and Political Participation: A Reexamination of the Standard Socioeconomic ModelSocial Forces, 1982
- Political Parties and Political Participation: A Reexamination of the Standard Socioeconomic ModelSocial Forces, 1982
- Costs and Values in the Calculus of VotingAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1982
- A Structural Analysis of Class VotingSocial Forces, 1982
- A Structural Analysis of Class VotingSocial Forces, 1982
- Explanations of Turnout DeclineAmerican Politics Quarterly, 1981
- Decline of U.S. Voter TurnoutAmerican Politics Quarterly, 1981
- Why Is Turnout Down?Public Opinion Quarterly, 1979
- Indifference, alientation and rational decisionsPublic Choice, 1973
- Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1956