Market Transparency: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 12 (1) , 5-35
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/12.1.5
Abstract
This study uses laboratory experiments to determine the effects of trade and quote disclosure on market efficiency, bid-ask spreads, and trader welfare. We show that trade disclosure increases the informational efficiency of transaction prices, but also increases opening bid-ask spreads, apparently by reducing market-makers' incentives to compete for order flow. As a result, trade disclosure benefits market makers at the expense of liquidity traders and informed traders. We find that quote disclosure has no discernible effects on market performance. Overall our results demonstrate that the degree of market transparency has important effects of market equilibria and on trader and market-maker welfare.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Price, trade size, and information in securities marketsPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Does order preferencing matter?Journal of Financial Economics, 1998
- Post-Trade Transparency in Multiple Dealer Financial MarketsSSRN Electronic Journal, 1997
- Quotes, Prices, and Estimates in a Laboratory MarketThe Journal of Finance, 1996
- Trade Transparency and the London Stock ExchangeEuropean Financial Management, 1996
- Market Reactions to Differentially Available Information in the LaboratoryJournal of Accounting Research, 1996
- Why do NASDAQ Market Makers Avoid Odd-Eighth Quotes?The Journal of Finance, 1994
- Price Formation and Equilibrium Liquidity in Fragmented and Centralized MarketsThe Journal of Finance, 1993
- Partial Revelation of Information in Experimental Asset MarketsThe Journal of Finance, 1991
- The Effect of Sequential Information Arrival on Asset Prices: An Experimental StudyThe Journal of Finance, 1987