Estimating uncertainty in fish stock assessment and forecasting
- 1 June 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Fish and Fisheries
- Vol. 2 (2) , 125-157
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-2960.2001.00042.x
Abstract
A variety of tools are available to quantify uncertainty in age‐structured fish stock assessments and in management forecasts. These tools are based on particular choices for the underlying population dynamics model, the aspects of the assessment considered uncertain, and the approach for assessing uncertainty (Bayes, frequentist or likelihood). The current state of the art is advancing rapidly as a consequence of the availability of increased computational power, but there remains little consistency in the choices made for assessments and forecasts. This can be explained by several factors including the specifics of the species under consideration, the purpose for which the analysis is conducted and the institutional framework within which the methods are developed and used, including the availability and customary usage of software tools. Little testing of either the methods or their assumptions has yet been done. Thus, it is not possible to argue either that the methods perform well or perform poorly or that any particular conditioning choices are more appropriate in general terms than others. Despite much recent progress, fisheries science has yet to identify a means for identifying appropriate conditioning choices such that the probability distributions which are calculated for management purposes do adequately represent the probabilities of eventual real outcomes. Therefore, we conclude that increased focus should be placed on testing and carefully examining the choices made when conducting these analyses, and that more attention must be given to examining the sensitivity to alternative assumptions and model structures. Provision of advice concerning uncertainty in stock assessments should include consideration of such sensitivities, and should use model‐averaging methods, decision tables or management procedure simulations in cases where advice is strongly sensitive to model assumptions.Keywords
This publication has 84 references indexed in Scilit:
- Management of summer-spawning herring off IcelandICES Journal of Marine Science, 1999
- Extended survivors analysis: An improved method for the analysis of catch-at-age data and abundance indicesICES Journal of Marine Science, 1999
- A model of trophic flows in the northern benguela upwelling system during the 1980sSouth African Journal of Marine Science, 1999
- Aspects of the ecology of a Boreal systemICES Journal of Marine Science, 1998
- Inference from a Deterministic Population Dynamics Model for Bowhead WhalesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1995
- Current Trends in Including Risk and Uncertainty in Stock Assessment and Harvest DecisionsCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1993
- Bootstrap Calculation of Catch-Per-Unit-Effort Variance from Trawl Logbooks: Do Fisheries Generate Enough Observations for Stock Assessments/North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 1992
- Approaches to Age-Structured Separable Sequential Population AnalysisCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1990
- Multispecies versus Single-Species Assessment of North Sea Fish StocksCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1987
- Better Bootstrap Confidence IntervalsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1987