Evaluating and Sentencing a Defendant as a Function of His Salience and the Perceiver's Set
- 1 January 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Vol. 5 (1) , 48-52
- https://doi.org/10.1177/014616727900500110
Abstract
A videotaped mock trial was employed to examine the effects of perceivers' cognitive set and the salience of a defendant upon perceivers' evaluations and sentencing of him. Cognitive set influenced both the range and the direction of salience effects. The defendant was seen as more responsible for the crime by perceivers who were set to watch a trial and to determine his guilt than by those who were set to watch a social interaction and to form an impression of him. Given a trial set, the more visibly salient the defendant, the more negatively he was evaluated. However, the defendant's salience did not influence the recommended sentence. Given an impression set, the more visibly salient the defendant, the more positively he was evaluated, and the more lenient the recommended sentence.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Salience, Attention, and Attribution: Top of the Head PhenomenaAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1978
- Figural emphasis and person perceptionJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1977
- Attributed intentions and informational selectivityJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1974
- A patient by any other name . . . : Clinician group difference in labeling bias.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974
- On the psychology of prediction.Psychological Review, 1973
- THE WARM‐COLD VARIABLE IN FIRST IMPRESSIONS OF PERSONSJournal of Personality, 1950