The learning ability paradox in adult metamemory research: Where are the metamemory differences between good and poor learners?
- 1 March 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Memory & Cognition
- Vol. 22 (2) , 249-257
- https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03208896
Abstract
College students’ ability to judge whether a studied item had been learned well enough to be recalled on a later test was examined in three experiments with self-paced learning procedures. Generally, these learners compensated for item difficulty when allocating study time, studying hard items longer than easy items, but they still recalled more easy items than hard items and tended to drop items out too soon. When provided with test opportunities during study or a delay between study and judgment, learners compensated significantly more for item difficulty and recalled substantially more. Paradoxically, good and poor learners compensated similarly for item difficulty and benefited similarly from testing during study and from delayed decision making. Thus, although the ability to make metamemory decisions was shown to be important for effective learning, these decisions were made equally well by good and poor associative learners. An analysis of tasks used to investigate metamemory-memory relationships in adult learning may provide an account for this apparent learning ability paradox.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Confidence-judgment accuracy as a predictor of test performancePublished by Elsevier ,2004
- When Predictions Create Reality: Judgments of Learning May Alter What They Are Intended to AssessPsychological Science, 1992
- Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effectMemory & Cognition, 1992
- Do memorability ratings affect study-time allocation?Memory & Cognition, 1990
- Allocation of self-paced study time and the "labor-in-vain effect."Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1988
- Metamemory: Monitoring future recallability during study.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1984
- Metacomprehension of text material.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1984
- Judgments of Knowing: The Influence of Retrieval PracticeThe American Journal of Psychology, 1980
- Spontaneous monitoring and regulation of learning: A comparison of successful and less successful fifth graders.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1980
- Invariance of total learning time under different conditions of practice.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969