The Impact of Changing Methods of Data Collection on the Reliability of Self-Reported Drug Use of Adolescents

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of different modes of data collection on the reliability of self-reported drug use of adolescents in a panel study. Adolescents were assigned to four groups based upon the ways they chose to respond to the survey instruments: 1) mailed questionnaires in both years, 2) survey interview in one year and mailed questionnaire in the next year, 3) mailed questionnaire in one year and survey interview in the following year, and 4) survey interview in both years. The quality of the self-reported data was examined in terms of return rates, missing data, internal consistency, and consistency of reported information over time. No significant differences were found between groups, suggesting that the mode of data collection does not affect the reliability of adolescents' self-reports of substance use.