REFRAMING THE ORGANIZATION: WHY IMPLEMENTING TOTAL QUALITY IS EASIER SAID THAN DONE
- 1 July 1994
- journal article
- Published by Academy of Management in Academy of Management Review
- Vol. 19 (3) , 565-584
- https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1994.9412271815
Abstract
This article presents a cognitive theory of why planned organizational change efforts, such as total quality initiatives, often fail. The theory suggests that employees resist total quality because their beliefs about the organization's identity constrain understanding and create cognitive opposition to radical change. We propose a dynamic model in which successful implementation of fundamental organizational transformation is partly dependent on management's ability to re-frame the change over time. Implementation may best be accomplished through a series of middle-range changes that are large enough to overcome cognitive inertia and relieve organizational stress, but not so large that members believe the proposed change is unobtainable or undesirable.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Strategic renewal and the interaction of cumulative stress and inertiaStrategic Management Journal, 1992
- Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiationStrategic Management Journal, 1991
- An Instrument for Measuring the Critical Factors of Quality ManagementDecision Sciences, 1989
- Rethinking incrementalismStrategic Management Journal, 1988
- Categorizing Strategic Issues: Links to Organizational ActionAcademy of Management Review, 1987
- Thinking About ImplementationJournal of Management, 1986
- Strategic Management in an Enacted WorldAcademy of Management Review, 1985
- Achieving Routine in Organizational ChangeJournal of Management, 1985
- Cognitive simplification processes in strategic decision‐makingStrategic Management Journal, 1984
- Reconciling logical incrementalism and synoptic formalism—an integrated approach to designing strategic planning processesStrategic Management Journal, 1982