Classification and Reconstruction in Revision Acetabular Arthroplasty With Bone Stock Deficiency
- 1 March 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Vol. 324 (324) , 98-107
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199603000-00012
Abstract
Revision acetabular surgery with bone stock loss is a difficult problem. Defects are classified into contained cavitary (Type-1) defects and noncontained defects (Type 2A and 2B) based on preoperative radiographs and intraoperative findings. Fifty-four hips with Type-1 defects were treated with morsellized allograft. The overall success rate was 90% at 6.78 year followup. Type-2 defects are reconstructed with structural grafts. Twenty-nine hips with Type-2A defects (the allograft supports 50% of the cup. There were 33 hips in this group observed for an average of 7.1 years. The rerevision rate in this group was 45%. However, 7 of 15 hips were reconstructed without additional graft at rerevision. The only factor that was clinically significant for success in Type-2B defects was choice of acetabular component. In hips that received roof rings with cemented cups, the success rate was 100% (excluding 1 infection). The authors support the use of allograft bone in revision acetabular surgery. When structural grafts are required, every attempt should be made to achieve >50% support from host bone. If this is not possible, then a roof reinforcement ring with a cemented cup is the acetabular component of choice.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Midterm results (5.5–10 years) of acetabular allograft reconstruction with the acetabular reinforcement ring during total hip revisionThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1994
- High placement of porous-coated acetabular components in complex total hip arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1994
- Failure of structural acetabular allografts in cementless revision hip arthroplastyThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1994
- Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1994
- High failure rate of bulk femoral head allografts in total hip acetabular reconstructions at 10 yearsThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1993
- Revision of the acetabular component without cement after total hip arthroplasty. Three to six-year follow-up.Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1993
- The fate of massive allografts in total hip acetabular revision surgeryThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1992
- Revision arthroplasty using an anti-protrusio cage for massive acetabular bone deficiencyThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1992
- The use of reinforcement rings to reconstruct deficient acetabulaThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1992
- Homograft bone in revision acetabular arthroplasty. A clinical and radiographic studyThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1988