Neuroligin-2 Deletion Selectively Decreases Inhibitory Synaptic Transmission Originating from Fast-Spiking but Not from Somatostatin-Positive Interneurons
Open Access
- 4 November 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Society for Neuroscience in Journal of Neuroscience
- Vol. 29 (44) , 13883-13897
- https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2457-09.2009
Abstract
Neuroligins are cell adhesion molecules involved in synapse formation and/or function. Neurons express four neuroligins (NL1–NL4), of which NL1 is specific to excitatory and NL2 to inhibitory synapses. Excitatory and inhibitory synapses include numerous subtypes. However, it is unknown whether NL1 performs similar functions in all excitatory and NL2 in all inhibitory synapses, or whether they regulate the formation and/or function of specific subsets of synapses. To address this central question, we performed paired recordings in primary somatosensory cortex of mice lacking NL1 or NL2. Using this system, we examined neocortical microcircuits formed by reciprocal synapses between excitatory neurons and two subtypes of inhibitory interneurons, namely, fast-spiking and somatostatin-positive interneurons. We find that the NL1 deletion had little effect on inhibitory synapses, whereas the NL2 deletion decreased (40–50%) the unitary (cell-to-cell) IPSC amplitude evoked from single fast-spiking interneurons. Strikingly, the NL2 deletion had no effect on IPSC amplitude evoked from single somatostatin-positive inhibitory interneurons. Moreover, the frequency of unitary synaptic connections between individual fast-spiking and somatostatin-positive interneurons and excitatory neurons was unchanged. The decrease in unitary IPSC amplitude originating from fast-spiking interneurons in NL2-deficient mice was due to a multiplicative and uniform downscaling of the amplitude distribution, which in turn was mediated by a decrease in both synaptic quantal amplitude and quantal content, the latter inferred from an increase in the coefficient of variation. Thus, NL2 is not necessary for establishing unitary inhibitory synaptic connections but is selectively required for “scaling up” unitary connections originating from a subset of interneurons.Keywords
This publication has 78 references indexed in Scilit:
- Imbalance of Neocortical Excitation and Inhibition and Altered UP States Reflect Network Hyperexcitability in the Mouse Model of Fragile X SyndromeJournal of Neurophysiology, 2008
- Neuroligins and neurexins link synaptic function to cognitive diseaseNature, 2008
- Differential Activity-Dependent, Homeostatic Plasticity of Two Neocortical Inhibitory CircuitsJournal of Neurophysiology, 2008
- Unusually rapid evolution of Neuroligin-4 in miceProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- Multiple Roles for the Active Zone Protein RIM1α in Late Stages of Neurotransmitter ReleaseNeuron, 2004
- Two Dynamically Distinct Inhibitory Networks in Layer 4 of the NeocortexJournal of Neurophysiology, 2003
- Synaptic adhesion moleculesCurrent Opinion in Cell Biology, 2003
- Mutations of the X-linked genes encoding neuroligins NLGN3 and NLGN4 are associated with autismNature Genetics, 2003
- Presynaptic short‐term depression is maintained during regulation of transmitter release at a GABAergic synapse in rat hippocampusThe Journal of Physiology, 2002
- Tonic inhibition originates from synapses close to the somaNeuron, 1995