Accuracy of set-up of thoracic radiotherapy: prospective analysis of 24 patients treated with radiotherapy for lung cancer
- 1 February 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The British Journal of Radiology
- Vol. 75 (890) , 162-169
- https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.75.890.750162
Abstract
In thoracic radiotherapy, a number of factors hinder the use of portal films and electronic portal imaging devices for measuring field placement errors (FPEs). The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of treatment set-up using simulator check films (SCFs) in radiotherapy for lung cancer. Prospective evaluation was performed on 24 patients. During their radiotherapy, patients returned to the simulator weekly for a minimum of four SCFs, for which the parameters from the original simulator planning film were set, positioning being achieved without fluoroscopy. A total of 96 SCFs were taken. FPEs in left-right (L-R) and superior-inferior (S-I) direction, as well as coronal rotational errors, were measured. The mean absolute FPE was 0.35 cm in the L-R axis and 0.43 cm in the S-I axis. Statistically, the FPEs in the S-I direction were greater than those in the L-R direction (p<0.001). A margin of 0.93 cm between the clinical target volume and the planning target volume would cover 95% of FPEs in the L-R direction, whilst a margin of 1.13 cm is needed for this degree of certainty in the S-I direction. Mean coronal rotational error was 1.6 degrees. Systematic errors were greater than random errors. This study demonstrated that the FPEs were within clinical tolerance (< or = 0.7 cm) in 84.9% of the measurements. The planning margins used in our clinical practice compare favourably with the FPEs in this study.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Accuracy of pelvic radiotherapy: prospective analysis of 90 patients in a randomised trial of blocked versus standard radiotherapyRadiotherapy and Oncology, 1996
- Is weekly port filming adequate for verifying patient position in modern radiation therapy?International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1994
- Maximizing setup accuracy using portal images as applied to a conformal boost technique for prostatic cancerRadiotherapy and Oncology, 1992
- A review of electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs)Medical Physics, 1992
- Improved methods for determination of variability in patient positioning for radiation therapy using simulation and serial portal film measurementsInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1992
- Fast evaluation of patient set-up during radiotherapy by aligning features in portal and simulator imagesPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 1991
- Is it necessary to repeat quality control procedures for head and neck patients?Radiotherapy and Oncology, 1991
- On-line measurement of field placement errors in external beam radiotherapyThe British Journal of Radiology, 1987
- Accuracy of radiation field alignment in clinical practiceInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1985
- Weekly localization films and detection of field placement errorsInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1978