Non‐linearity in the cost‐effectiveness frontier
- 13 January 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Health Economics
- Vol. 15 (6) , 565-577
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1083
Abstract
Conventional cost-effectiveness decision rules rely on the assumptions that all health care programmes are divisible and exhibit constant returns to scale for a homogeneous population; hence, the path between adjacent programmes on a cost-effectiveness frontier must be linear. In this paper we build a framework to analyse non-linear ‘expansion’ paths. We model the impact of two key sources of non-linearity: economies of scale or scope in the production of health care; and prioritisation of patients who are most likely to benefit from more expensive and more effective treatments. We conclude that the expansion path might be linear, convex or concave, depending on the situation. The path might also exhibit vertical discontinuity due to fixed costs or horizontal discontinuity due to indivisibility. The efficiency of resource allocation might be improved by empirical estimation of expansion paths. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this approach compared with a standard stratified analysis. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does NICE have a cost‐effectiveness threshold and what other factors influence its decisions? A binary choice analysisHealth Economics, 2004
- Cost‐effectiveness analysis and health care resource allocation: decision rules under variable returns to scaleHealth Economics, 2003
- Stratified cost‐effectiveness analysis: a framework for establishing efficient limited use criteriaHealth Economics, 2003
- The relationship between cost-effectiveness analysis and cost-benefit analysisSocial Science & Medicine, 1995
- Cost effectiveness/utility analyses: Do current decision rules lead us to where we want to be?Journal of Health Economics, 1992
- On the (Near) Equivalence of Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Benefit AnalysesInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1991
- Focusing Technology Assessment Using Medical Decision TheoryMedical Decision Making, 1988
- Measuring the Accuracy of Diagnostic SystemsScience, 1988
- Evaluation of public investment in health care: Is the risk irrelevant?Journal of Health Economics, 1983
- Basic principles of ROC analysisSeminars in Nuclear Medicine, 1978