Differences in the pharmacokinetics of protease inhibitors between healthy volunteers and HIV-infected persons
- 1 May 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS
- Vol. 3 (3) , 296-305
- https://doi.org/10.1097/coh.0b013e3282f82bf1
Abstract
Purpose of review Pharmacokinetic and drug–drug interaction studies are conducted in both healthy volunteers and the target population (HIV-infected patients), but there is little discussion of the potential for differences in drug disposition between the two groups. It is important to recognize that the pharmacokinetics of drugs may be altered in HIV-infected persons as compared with healthy individuals. The aim of this review is to highlight some of the important differences in drug handling between healthy volunteers and HIV-infected individuals, focusing on protease inhibitors. Recent findings Studies aimed at characterizing disparities in pharmacokinetics between healthy volunteers and HIV patients are lacking. Data suggest that concentrations of some protease inhibitors are lower in HIV patients than in HIV-negative volunteers (atazanavir and tipranavir), but generally comparisons are made across studies and study centres, and so multiple variables, such as differences in food and study design, can influence findings. We have conducted an ‘in-house’ analysis, comparing atazanavir, lopinavir and saquinavir between HIV-infected patients and healthy volunteers enrolled in the same study centre with similar study designs. Summary For atazanavir the current data are quite convincing that concentrations are lower in HIV-infected patients than in healthy individuals, but for others it is not so clear. The ‘in-house’ analyses for atazanavir, lopinavir and saquinavir attempted to address some of the difficulties with cross-study comparisons, but it should be noted that subject numbers were small. Physiological changes resulting from HIV disease can influence drug pharmacokinetics and the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated.Keywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Association of Saquinavir Plasma Concentrations with Side Effects but Not with Antiretroviral Outcome in Patients Infected with Protease Inhibitor-Susceptible Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2007
- Fosamprenavir plus Ritonavir Increases Plasma Ketoconazole and Ritonavir Exposure, while Amprenavir Exposure Remains UnchangedAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2007
- Interaction between buprenorphine and atazanavir or atazanavir/ritonavirDrug and Alcohol Dependence, 2007
- Steady-State Disposition of the Nonpeptidic Protease Inhibitor Tipranavir when Coadministered with RitonavirAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2007
- Pharmacokinetics of Saquinavir, Atazanavir, and Ritonavir in a Twice-Daily Boosted Double-Protease Inhibitor RegimenAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2007
- Pharmacokinetic Interaction between Darunavir Boosted with Ritonavir and Omeprazole or Ranitidine in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Negative Healthy VolunteersAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2007
- Plasma Amprenavir Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability following Administration of 1,400 Milligrams of Fosamprenavir Once Daily in Combination with either 100 or 200 Milligrams of Ritonavir in Healthy VolunteersAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2007
- Lopinavir/Ritonavir Pharmacokinetics in HIV and Hepatitis C Virus Co-Infected Patients without Liver Function ImpairmentClinical Pharmacokinetics, 2007
- Effect of Rifampin on Steady-State Pharmacokinetics of Atazanavir with Ritonavir in Healthy VolunteersAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2006
- Pharmacokinetics of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Ritonavir-Boosted Saquinavir Mesylate Administered Alone or in Combination at Steady StateAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2006