Tree disagreement: Measuring and testing incongruence in phylogenies
- 1 February 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Biomedical Informatics
- Vol. 39 (1) , 86-102
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2005.08.008
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 86 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Utility of the Incongruence Length Difference TestSystematic Biology, 2002
- When Does the Incongruence Length Difference Test Fail?Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2002
- Increased Congruence Does Not Necessarily Indicate Increased Phylogenetic Accuracy—The Behavior of the Incongruence Length Difference Test in Mixed-Model AnalysesSystematic Biology, 2002
- Failure of the ILD to Determine Data Combinability for Slow Loris PhylogenySystematic Biology, 2001
- Noise and Incongruence: Interpreting Results of the Incongruence Length Difference TestMolecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2000
- An archaeal genomic signatureProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2000
- Is Congruence between Data Partitions a Reliable Predictor of Phylogenetic Accuracy? Empirically Testing an Iterative Procedure for Choosing among Phylogenetic MethodsSystematic Biology, 1997
- Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined?Molecular Biology and Evolution, 1997
- TESTING SIGNIFICANCE OF INCONGRUENCECladistics, 1994
- The Implications of Congruence in MenidiaSystematic Zoology, 1981