Validation of potential classification criteria for systemic sclerosis
Open Access
- 2 November 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Arthritis Care & Research
- Vol. 64 (3) , 358-367
- https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20684
Abstract
Objective Classification criteria for systemic sclerosis (SSc; scleroderma) are being updated jointly by the American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism. Potential items for classification were reduced to 23 using Delphi and nominal group techniques. We evaluated the face, discriminant, and construct validity of the items to be further studied as potential criteria. Methods Face validity was evaluated using the frequency of items in patients sampled from the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group, 1000 Faces of Lupus, and the Pittsburgh, Toronto, Madrid, and Berlin connective tissue disease (CTD) databases. Patients with SSc (n = 783) were compared to 1,071 patients with diseases similar to SSc (mimickers): systemic lupus erythematosus (n = 499), myositis (n = 171), Sjögren's syndrome (n = 95), Raynaud's phenomenon (RP; n = 228), mixed CTD (n = 29), and idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH; n = 49). Discriminant validity was evaluated using odds ratios (ORs). For construct validity, empirical ranking was compared to expert ranking. Results Compared to mimickers, patients with SSc were more likely to have skin thickening (OR 427); telangiectasias (OR 91); anti–RNA polymerase III antibody (OR 75); puffy fingers (OR 35); finger flexion contractures (OR 29); tendon/bursal friction rubs (OR 27); anti–topoisomerase I antibody (OR 25); RP (OR 24); fingertip ulcers/pitting scars (OR 19); anticentromere antibody (OR 14); abnormal nailfold capillaries (OR 10); gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms (OR 8); antinuclear antibody, calcinosis, dysphagia, and esophageal dilation (all OR 6); interstitial lung disease/pulmonary fibrosis (OR 5); and anti–PM‐Scl antibody (OR 2). Reduced carbon monoxide diffusing capacity, PAH, and reduced forced vital capacity had ORs of P = 0.01). Conclusion The candidate items have good face, discriminant, and construct validity. Further item reduction will be evaluated in prospective SSc and mimicker cases.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Items for developing revised classification criteria in systemic sclerosis: Results of a consensus exerciseArthritis Care & Research, 2011
- Preliminary criteria for the very early diagnosis of systemic sclerosis: results of a Delphi Consensus Study from EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research GroupAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2011
- The 1000 Canadian Faces of Lupus: Determinants of Disease Outcome in a Large Multiethnic CohortThe Journal of Rheumatology, 2009
- Ethnic Influence on Disease Manifestations and Autoantibodies in Chinese-Descent Patients with Systemic SclerosisThe Journal of Rheumatology, 2009
- Classification criteria for rheumatic diseases: Why and how?Arthritis Care & Research, 2007
- Changes in causes of death in systemic sclerosis, 1972–2002Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2007
- Revising the classification criteria for systemic sclerosis.Arthritis & Rheumatism, 2006
- Classification of systemic sclerosis. Visions and reality**Dedicated to the memory of E. Carwile LeRoy, 1933–2002.Rheumatology, 2005
- Updating the American college of rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosusArthritis & Rheumatism, 1997