Radiation Therapy With or Without Concurrent Low-Dose Daily Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced, Nonmetastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
- 1 September 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 22 (17) , 3540-3548
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.10.076
Abstract
Purpose: To retrospectively investigate the difference between conventionally fractionated (CF) and hyperfractionated (Hfx) radiation therapy (RT), with and without either daily cisplatin (CDDP) or carboplatin (CBDCA), in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) enrolled onto two consecutive prospective randomized studies. Patients and Methods: Treatment consisted of CF RT (70 Gy, group 1), CF RT and either daily CDDP (6 mg/m2) or daily CBDCA (25 mg/m2; group 2), Hfx RT (77 Gy, 1.1 Gy bid; group 3), or Hfx RT and daily CDDP (group 4). Results: Hfx RT plus CDDP achieved better overall survival (OS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) than any other group. There was an insignificant difference favoring Hfx RT over CF RT, either alone or in combination with CDDP or CBDCA, regarding both OS (P = .058 and P = .051, respectively) and LRFS (P = .088 and P = .091, respectively). No difference was seen between CF RT plus chemotherapy (CHT) and Hfx RT alone regarding either OS (P = .32) or LRFS (P = .48). Regional recurrence-free survival was similar in the four treatment groups. CF RT plus CHT and Hfx RT plus CDDP achieved better distant metastasis-free survival than CF RT and Hfx RT. High-grade toxicity was significantly more frequent in Hfx RT plus CDDP than in any other group, except in the Hfx RT group. Hfx RT led to significantly more acute toxicity and xerostomia than CF RT plus CHT. Hfx RT was more toxic than CF RT, either alone or with concurrent CHT. Conclusion: Results of this study show that there may be a therapeutic benefit for CF RT plus CHT over Hfx RT plus CDDP in patients with SCCHN, but this cannot be firmly established without a larger and well-planned controlled trial.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Choosing a concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy regimen for squamous cell head and neck cancer: A systematic review of the published literature with subgroup analysisHead & Neck, 2001
- Enhancement of Tumor Response to -Radiation by an Inhibitor of Cyclooxygenase-2 EnzymeJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1999
- Hyperfractionated Irradiation with or without Concurrent Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- A phase III randomized trial comparing concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy with radiotherapy alone in resectable stage III and IV squamous cell head and neck cancer: Preliminary resultsHead & Neck, 1997
- A modelled comparison of the effects of using different ways to compensate for missed treatment days in radiotherapyClinical Oncology, 1996
- Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC)International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1995
- Loss of local control with prolongation in radiotherapyInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1992
- Astro plenary: Interfraction interval is a major determinant of late effects, with hyperfractionated radiation therapy of carcinomas of upper respiratory and digestive tracts: Results from radiation therapy oncology group protocol 8313International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1991
- Inherent acceleration of tumor dose-rate in hyperfractionated regimensInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1988
- Concurrent daily cisplatin and radiotherapy in locally advanced squamous carcinoma of the head-and-neck and bronchusRadiotherapy and Oncology, 1987