A general framework for the aggregation model of coexistence
- 12 July 2002
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Animal Ecology
- Vol. 71 (4) , 651-662
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00628.x
Abstract
Summary: The aggregation model of coexistence has been used widely to explain the coexistence of competing species that utilize patchy and ephemeral resources. Over the years, it has been reformulated in many different ways, using different assumptions, indices and analyses, leading sometimes to contradictory conclusions. We present a general framework, from which many of the alternative approaches are derived as special cases. A generalized distribution, composed of the distribution of visits across patches and the distribution of eggs per visit, is used to model changes in the mean individual‐level experience of density that occur at different population‐level densities. New and more general criteria for coexistence are derived, based upon standard invasability analysis of Lotka–Volterra competition equations applied to a patchy system. An important parameter in the new coexistence criteria is the mean per capita density of individuals in a single clutch (). Until now this measure has been relatively ignored, experimentally and theoretically. We confirm earlier findings that the random distribution of clutches may be a sufficient cause of aggregated egg distributions to allow coexistence between species of unequal competitive ability, but only if the product of competition coefficients is less than one.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species DiversityAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 2000
- Aggregation and Coexistence in a Carrion Fly CommunityEcological Monographs, 1991
- Competition on a Divided and Ephemeral Resource: Testing the Assumptions. I. AggregationJournal of Animal Ecology, 1990
- Sampling Scale Dependence of Taylor's Power LawOikos, 1990
- Covariance, coexistence and the population dynamics of two competitors using a patchy resourceJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1988
- Aggregation Does Prevent Competitive Exclusion: A Response to GreenThe American Naturalist, 1988
- Interspecific competition is not a major organizing force in many insect communitiesNature, 1984
- Coexistence of Competitors in Patchy Environment with and without PredationOikos, 1981
- Non-Equilibrium `Island' Communities: Diptera Breeding in Dead SnailsJournal of Animal Ecology, 1977
- The Meaning and Measurement of Frequency‐Dependent CompetitionEcology, 1977