The Need for Evidence-Based Medicine
- 1 November 1995
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
- Vol. 88 (11) , 620-624
- https://doi.org/10.1177/014107689508801105
Abstract
As physicians, whether serving individual patients or populations, we always have sought to base our decisions and actions on the best possible evidence. The ascendancy of the randomized trial heralded a fundamental shift in the way that we establish the clinical bases for diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutics. The ability to track down, critically appraise (for its validity and usefulness), and incorporate this rapidly growing body of evidence into one's clinical practice has been named ‘evidence-based medicine’5,6 (EBM).Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviewsBMJ, 1994
- Effects of Computer-based Clinical Decision Support Systems on Clinician Performance and Patient Outcome: A Critical Appraisal of ResearchAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1994
- The Science of Reviewing ResearchaAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1993
- Cochrane's legacyThe Lancet, 1992
- A Comparison of Results of Meta-analyses of Randomized Control Trials and Recommendations of Clinical ExpertsJAMA, 1992
- Mortality and Morbidity in Patients Receiving Encainide, Flecainide, or PlaceboNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Treatment of ventricular arrhythmias by United States cardiologists: a survey before the cardiac arrhythmia suppression trial results were availableThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
- Information Needs in Office Practice: Are They Being Met?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1985
- A Randomized Trial of Continuing Medical EducationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Ventricular Premature Beats and Mortality after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977