Survival of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Treated with Radiation and Temozolomide in Research Studies in the United States
Top Cited Papers
- 14 April 2010
- journal article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 16 (8) , 2443-2449
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-3106
Abstract
Purpose: Novel agents are currently combined with radiation and temozolomide (RT + TMZ) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma using overall survival as the primary end point. Results of these phase II studies are typically compared with the phase III European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) survival data that resulted in RT + TMZ becoming standard therapy. Experimental Design: The New Approaches to Brain Tumor Therapy (NABTT) Consortium assigned 365 patients with glioblastoma to four single-cohort studies with similar eligibility criteria. Patients received RT + TMZ with talampanel (n = 72), poly-ICLC (n = 97), or cilengitide (n = 112) or RT + TMZ alone with monitoring of CD4 counts (n = 84). Overall survival of those ages 18 to 70 years with glioblastoma was compared with published EORTC data. Results: NABTT and EORTC patients had comparable performance status and debulking surgery. Median, 12-month, and 24-month survival rates for the EORTC patients (n = 287) and the comparable NABTT patients receiving RT + TMZ and novel agents (n = 244) are 14.6 versus 19.6 months, 61% versus 81%, and 27% versus 37%, respectively. This represents a 37% reduction in odds of death (P < 0.0001) through 2 years of follow-up. NABTT and EORTC patients receiving only RT + TMZ had similar survival. Conclusions: Newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated recently with RT + TMZ and talampanel, poly-ICLC, or cilengitide had significantly longer survival than similar patients treated with only RT + TMZ accrued internationally from 2000 to 2002. These differences could result from the novel agents or changing patterns of care. Until the reasons for these different survival rates are clarified, comparisons of outcomes from phase II studies with published RT + TMZ survival data should be interpreted with caution. Clin Cancer Res; 16(8); 2443–9. ©2010 AACR.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse in the treatment of gliomasCurrent Opinion in Neurology, 2009
- Patterns of relapse and prognosis after bevacizumab failure in recurrent glioblastomaNeurology, 2009
- Antiangiogenic therapies for high-grade gliomaNature Reviews Neurology, 2009
- Bevacizumab Alone and in Combination With Irinotecan in Recurrent GlioblastomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- Talampanel With Standard Radiation and Temozolomide in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: A Multicenter Phase II TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trialThe Lancet Oncology, 2009
- Phase II Study of Erlotinib Plus Temozolomide During and After Radiation Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme or GliosarcomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- Malignant Gliomas in AdultsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Phase II study of temozolomide, thalidomide, and celecoxib for newly diagnosed glioblastoma in adultsNeuro-Oncology, 2008
- Radiotherapy plus Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide for GlioblastomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005