Myths and realities of antiemetic treatment.
- 1 December 1992
- journal article
- review article
- Vol. 19, S46-S53
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prognostic factors influencing cisplatin-induced emesis. Definition and validation of a predictive logistic modelCancer, 1989
- Laparotomic eventration or colonic prolapse after chemotherapy‐induced emesisJournal of Surgical Oncology, 1988
- EVALUATION OF AN ANTIEMETIC REGIMEN WITH HIGH-DOSAGE METHOCHLOPRAMIDE, DEXAMETHASONE AND DIPHENHYDRAMINE IN PATIENTS ON CHEMOTHERAPY WITH CISPLATINUM1986
- Incidence, course, and severity of delayed nausea and vomiting following the administration of high-dose cisplatin.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1985
- A comparison of the antiemetic efficacy of prochlorperazine and metoclopramide for the treatment of cisplatin-induced emesis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1985
- High-dose metoclopramide: control of dacarbazine-induced emesis in a preliminary trial.1982
- THE COURSE OF NAUSEA AND VOMITING AFTER HIGH-DOSE CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE1982
- A comparison of the antiemetic effects of droperidol and prochlorperazine in chemotherapy with cis-platinumGynecologic Oncology, 1980
- THERAPY-LINKED LEUKÆMIAThe Lancet, 1977
- Cancer Treatment Needs Better AntiemeticsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1975