Implicit coscheduling

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
In modern distributed systems, coordinated time-sharing is required for communicating processes to leverage the performance of switch-based networks and low-overhead protocols. Coordinated time-sharing has traditionally been achieved with gang scheduling or explicit coscheduling, implementations of which often suffer from many deficiencies: multiple points of failure, high context-switch overheads, and poor interaction with client-server, interactive, and I/O -intensive workloads. Implicit coscheduling dynamically coordinates communicating processes across distributed machines without these structural deficiencies. In implicit coscheduling, no communication is required across operating systems schedulers; instead, cooperating processes achieve coordination by reacting to implicit information carried by communication existing within the parallel application. The implementation of this approach is simple and allows participating nodes to act autonomously. We introduce two key mechanisms in implicit coscheduling. The first is conditional two-phase waiting, a generalization of traditional two-phase waiting in which spin-time may be increased depending upon events occuring while the process waits. The second is an extension to stride scheduling that provides preemption and is fair to processes that block. To demonstrate that implicit coscheduling performs well, we show results from an extensive set of simulation and implementation experiments. To exercise the conditional two-phase waiting algorithm, we examine three workloads: bulk-synchronous and continuous-communication synthetic applications and application kernels written in the Split-C language. To exercise the local scheduler, we examine competing jobs with different communication characteristics. We demonstrate that our implementation scales well with the number of jobs and workstations and is robust to process placement. Our experiments show that implicit coscheduling is effective and fair for a wide range of workloads; most perform within 30% of an idealized model of gang scheduling.

This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit: