Effects of communicating individual risks in screening programmes: Cochrane systematic review
Open Access
- 25 September 2003
- Vol. 327 (7417) , 703-709
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7417.703
Abstract
Objective To assess the effects of different types of individualised risk communication for patients who are deciding whether to participate in screening. Design Systematic review. Data sources Specialist register of the Cochrane consumers and communication review group, scientific databases, and a manual follow up of references. Selection of studies Studies were randomised controlled trials addressing decisions by patients whether or not to undergo screening and incorporating an intervention with an element of “individualised” risk communication–based on the individual's own risk factors for a condition (such as age or family history). Outcome measures The principal outcome was uptake of screening tests; further cognitive and affective measures were also assessed to gauge informed decision making. Results 13 studies were included, 10 of which addressed mammography programmes. Individualised risk communication was associated with an increased uptake of screening tests (odds ratio 1.5, 95% confidence interval 1.11 to 2.03). Few cognitive or affective outcomes were reported consistently, so it was not possible to conclude whether this increase in the uptake of tests was related to informed decision making by patients. Conclusions Individualised risk estimates may be effective for purposes of population health, but their effects on increasing uptake of screening programmes may not be interpretable as evidence of informed decision making by patients. Greater attention is required to ways of developing interventions for screening programmes that can achieve this.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Screening for cardiovascular risk: public health imperative or matter for individual informed choice?BMJ, 2002
- Information about screening – is it to achieve high uptake or to ensure informed choice?Health Expectations, 2001
- The Effectiveness of One-to-one Risk-communication Interventions in Health CareMedical Decision Making, 2000
- Tailored Risk Notification for Women with a Family History of Breast CancerPreventive Medicine, 1999
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Effect of interventions on stage of mammography adoptionJournal of Behavioral Medicine, 1995
- Strategies to Increase Mammography UtilizationMedical Care, 1994
- The development of a six‐item short‐form of the state scale of the Spielberger State—Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1992
- Projecting Individualized Probabilities of Developing Breast Cancer for White Females Who Are Being Examined AnnuallyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1989
- Improving Risk CommunicationRisk Analysis, 1986