The Effects of Objectives and Constraints on Motor Control Strategy in Reciprocal Aiming Movements
- 1 June 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Motor Behavior
- Vol. 24 (2) , 173-185
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1992.9941613
Abstract
The goal of this study was to examine how the kinematics of reciprocal aiming movements were affected by both the objective of the movement and the constraints operating on that movement. In Experiment 1, the objective of the movement was indirectly manipulated by capitalizing on the fact that subjects determine their own accuracy and speed limits, despite uniform task instructions to move as quickly and accurately as possible. A Fitts' type reciprocal aiming paradigm was employed, in which 69 subjects were asked to move a stylus repetitively between two spatially separated targets. Four target widths were orthogonally combined with four movement amplitudes, resulting in 16 conditions. Movements were made on an X-Y digitizing tablet. Based on the mean variable error produced on both targets, subjects were differentiated post hoc into three movement objective groups: speed, accuracy, and speed-plus-accuracy. Kinematic analyses revealed that the programming and execution of movements were systematically influenced by both the movement objective and the movement constraints. That is, movement time, peak velocity, dwell time, acceleration and deceleration time, normalized acceleration and normalized deceleration varied systematically as a function of both the speed-accuracy movement objective and the movement constraints of target size and movement distance. Moreover, the consequences of changing the constraints of the movement were affected by an interaction with the objective of the movement. In Experiment 2, the objective of the movement was directly manipulated by varying speed and/or accuracy instructions to subjects. The basic results of Experiment 1 were substantiated. Overall, the results were consistent with the view that motor control is dependent upon sensory consequences.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effect of accuracy constraints on three-dimensional movement kinematicsNeuroscience, 1990
- Optimality in human motor performance: Ideal control of rapid aimed movements.Psychological Review, 1988
- Constraints on human arm movement trajectories.Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 1987
- Motor skill: Feedback, knowledge, and structural issues.Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 1985
- Inegration of visual cues in rapid goal-directed movementsBehavioural Brain Research, 1982
- Models for the speed and accuracy of aimed movements.Psychological Review, 1982
- Processing visual feedback information for movement control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1981
- Movement control characteristics of aiming responses?Ergonomics, 1980
- Information capacity of discrete motor responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964
- The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1954