A prospective randomized study of induction of labor
- 1 August 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
- Vol. 21 (4) , 333-336
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7292(83)90025-5
Abstract
In a prospective randomized study spontaneous and oxytocin induced labor have been compared with respect to duration of labor and the condition of the fetus and the newborn infant. The study consists of 166 normal patients at full term. No significant differences between the two groups were found, and the results of the study showed that induction of labor between the 40th and 41st week of pregnancy was safe for the fetus. It is concluded that there seems to be no increased risks to mother or fetus from induction of labor compared to normal labor provided that there is cephalic presentation and a normal pregnancy.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- CASE-CONTROL ANALYSIS OF POST-TERM INDUCTION OF LABOR1982
- Spontaneous Labor and Elective Induction—A Prospective Randomized Study: II. Bilirubin Levels in the Neonatal PeriodActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1980
- SPONTANEOUS LABOUR AND ELECTIVE INDUCTION—A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY Behavioural Assessment and Neurological Examination in the Newborn PeriodActa Paediatrica, 1979
- INDUCTION OF LABOUR‐A SIX YEAR REVIEWBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1979
- A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF INDUCTION OF LABOURBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1979
- Infant outcome following labor inductionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1979
- SPONTANEOUS LABOR AND ELECTIVE INDUCTION—A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDYActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1979
- Perinatal deaths: analysis by clinical cause to assess value of induction of labour.BMJ, 1977
- Obstetric practice and outcome of pregnancy in Cardiff residents 1965-73.BMJ, 1976
- PELVIC SCORING FOR ELECTIVE INDUCTION1964