Evaluation of Sleep‐Disordered Breathing in Children
- 1 March 2003
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery
- Vol. 128 (3) , 344-352
- https://doi.org/10.1067/mhn.2003.4
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated changes in disease-specific quality of life (QOL) for children with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). PATIENTS, DESIGN, AND SETTING: We conducted a cohort study in 69 children (age range, 6 months to 13 years; median age, 6.1 years) from a hospital-based pediatric otolaryngology practice in a metropolitan area. We used the OSA-18, an 18-item QOL survey with known test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity. Survey domains included sleep disturbance, physical suffering, emotional distress, daytime problems, and caregiver concerns. INTERVENTION: Tonsillectomy or adenoidectomy was performed as part of routine clinical care. The OSA-18 was completed at entry by the child's caregiver and again at least 4 weeks after surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The validity of the OSA-18 change score was assessed by comparison with multiple external constructs, including a validated measure of longitudinal change (OSD-6 survey). Responsiveness was assessed by the standardized response mean (SRM). RESULTS: The mean baseline OSA-18 survey score was 3.1 (SD, 0.9) of a maximum 7.0, with higher values indicating poorer QOL. Change scores were available for all children, with a mean interval between preoperative and postoperative surveys of 61 days (range, 42 to 92 days). The mean OSA-18 change score of 1.14 (SD, 0.71) showed significant correlation with tonsil size (r = 0.40), adenoid size (r = 0.31), OSD-6 change scores (r = 0.71), and the direct caregiver estimates of change (r = 0.34). OSA-18 change scores showed large responsiveness to change (SRM 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.16 to 69), with the most responsive domains being sleep disturbance, physical suffering, and care-giver concerns. Significant responsiveness was also demonstrated for the domains of daytime problems and emotional distress. CONCLUSIONS: The OSA-18 is a valid, reliable, and responsive QOL measure that combines the advantages of a discriminative and evaluative survey in a single instrument. The OSA-18 is a useful measure of patient-based outcomes for clinical trials, health services research, and routine clinical care.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instrumentsPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Measuring Quality of Life in Children With Obstructive Sleep DisordersJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 2000
- Quality of Life for Children with Obstructive Sleep ApneaOtolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, 2000
- Pediatric Outcomes Research: Development of an Outcomes Instrument for Tonsil and Adenoid DiseaseThe Laryngoscope, 2000
- Inability of Clinical History to Distinguish Primary Snoring From Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome in ChildrenChest, 1995
- Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific quality of life questionnaireJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1994
- Measuring Health-Related Quality of LifeAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1993
- Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures statistics and strategies for evaluationControlled Clinical Trials, 1991
- Comparisons of Five Health Status Instruments for Orthopedic EvaluationMedical Care, 1990
- A diagnostic approach to suspected obstructive sleep apnea in childrenThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1984