Abstract
In an effort to develop a more efficacious screening device for selecting bright and slow kindergarten children, four hypotheses were tested: (a) that teachers are subject to a CA bias, selecting older children as bright and younger children as slow; (b) that teachers can make a more accurate judgment of young children's ability by evaluating a child's ability in a number of specific areas to procure a composite score; (c) that a still more accurate estimate can be made by making a mechanical adjustment for CA and applying it to the composite score; and (d) that such an adjusted score can be successfully utilized as a screening device in selecting bright and slow children. The first three hypotheses were supported by the data, but the data were equivocal in relation to the last hypothesis.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: