Analysis of an Autographa californica Multicapsid Nucleopolyhedrovirus lef-6 -Null Virus: LEF-6 Is Not Essential for Viral Replication but Appears To Accelerate Late Gene Transcription
- 1 June 2002
- journal article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Virology
- Vol. 76 (11) , 5503-14
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.76.11.5503-5514.2002
Abstract
The Autographa californica multicapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus (Ac M NPV) lef-6 gene was previously shown to be necessary for optimal transcription from an Ac M NPV late promoter in transient late expression assays. In the present study, we examined the expression and cellular localization of lef-6 during the Ac M NPV infection cycle and generated a lef-6 -null virus for studies of the role of lef-6 in the infection cycle. Transcription of lef-6 was detected from 4 to 48 h postinfection, and the LEF-6 protein was identified in dense regions of infected cell nuclei, a finding consistent with its potential role as a late transcription factor. To examine lef-6 in the context of the Ac M NPV infection cycle, we deleted the lef-6 gene from an Ac M NPV genome propagated as an infectious BACmid in Escherichia coli . Unexpectedly, the resulting Ac M NPV lef-6 -null BACmid (vAc lef6KO ) was able to propagate in cell culture, although virus yields were substantially reduced. Thus, the lef-6 gene is not essential for viral replication in Sf9 cells. Two “repair” Ac M NPV BACmids (vAc lef6KO-REP-P and vAc lef6KO-REP-ie1P ) were generated by transposition of the lef-6 gene into the polyhedrin locus of the vAc lef6KO BACmid. Virus yields from the two repair viruses were similar to those from wild-type Ac M NPV or a control (BACmid-derived) virus. The lef-6 -null BACmid (vAc lef6KO ) was further examined to determine whether the deletion of lef-6 affected DNA replication or late gene transcription in the context of an infection. The lef-6 deletion did not appear to affect viral DNA replication. Using Northern blot analysis, we found that although early transcription was apparently unaffected, both late and very late transcription were delayed in cells infected with the lef-6 -null BACmid. This phenotype was rescued in viruses containing the lef-6 gene reinserted into the polyhedrin locus. Thus, the lef-6 gene was not essential for either viral DNA replication or late gene transcription, but the absence of lef-6 resulted in a substantial delay in the onset of late transcription. Therefore, lef-6 appears to accelerate the infection cycle of Ac M NPV.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pseudotyping Autographa californica Multicapsid Nucleopolyhedrovirus (Ac M NPV): F Proteins from Group II NPVs Are Functionally Analogous to Ac M NPV GP64Journal of Virology, 2002
- Analysis of an Autographa californica Nucleopolyhedrovirus lef-11 Knockout: LEF-11 Is Essential for Viral DNA ReplicationJournal of Virology, 2002
- Mutational Analysis of Baculovirus Capping Enzyme Lef4 Delineates an Autonomous Triphosphatase Domain and Structural Determinants of Divalent Cation SpecificityPublished by Elsevier ,2001
- Sequence Analysis of the Plutella xylostella Granulovirus GenomeVirology, 2000
- Requirement for GP64 to Drive Efficient Budding ofAutographa californicaMulticapsid NucleopolyhedrovirusVirology, 1999
- Late Promoter Selection in the Baculovirusgp64 Envelope Fusion ProteinGeneVirology, 1997
- Deletion Analysis of Four of Eighteen Late Gene Expression Factor Gene Homologues of the Baculovirus, BmNPVVirology, 1997
- Mutational analysis of a baculovirus major late promoterGene, 1994
- Categorizing some early and late transcripts directed by the Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virusJournal of General Virology, 1990
- Baculovirus transcription in the presence of inhibitors and in nonpermissive Drosophila cellsVirus Research, 1986