Comparative evaluation of the systemic and secretory antibody response to live attenuated (oral) poliovirus vaccine (OPV) or inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) has suggested that both vaccines are highly effective in inducing seroconversion and in preventing paralytic poliomyelitis. However, parenteral immunization with IPV does not appear to be highly effective in inducing secretory antibody response in the nasopharynx or alimentary tract during primary immunization. Reimmunization with IPV in subjects previously primed with parenterally administered IPV appears to result in a mild booster effect on the development of secretory antibody response. More significantly, rechallenge by the oral route with OPV in IPV-primed subjects resulted in a marked enhancement of secretory antibody response. In general, no suppression of systemic or secretory response to poliovirus was observed with either form (OPV vs. IPV) or with route of immunization. These observations are discussed in relation to the immune response observed with other mucosally or parenterally administered antigens. Their implications in the development of oral tolerance are briefly reviewed.