What is the evidence on evidence‐based nursing? An epistemological concern
- 1 February 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Vol. 37 (3) , 250-257
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02065.x
Abstract
What is the evidence on evidence‐based nursing? An epistemological concern Aim. This paper adopts an epistemological perspective in order to support the assertion that there is very little evidence to support the existence of evidence‐based nursing as a distinct construct or process. Rationale. This analysis of concept meaning is based on the theory of symbolic interactionism. By adopting this theory the commonalities and inconsistencies in the use of evidence‐based symbolism by nurses and other health care professionals can be used to evaluate the perceived meaning of the term. Methods. A frequency analysis of relevant key words in one publications data‐base demonstrates the increasing use of evidence‐based terminology and its euphemistic status visa vi research. An epistemological analysis is conducted on a sample of concept clarification statements taken from the popular literature, defining the nature of `evidence' and `evidence‐based practice'. Findings. The results of the frequency analysis show that the keywords `evidence‐based medicine' revealed 5612 papers, evidence‐based practice (EBP) 432 papers, evidence‐based nursing 47 papers, evidence‐based health care 60 papers, and evidence‐based decision making 43. Almost all of these papers have been published since 1995 and the earliest use of the symbol `evidence‐based' is 1992. There is also an increase in papers adopting `evidence‐based' symbolism along with a commensurate decrease in the use of the term `research' in the nursing context. Conclusion. `Evidence‐based practice' is commonly a euphemism for information management, clinical judgement, professional practice development or managed care. There is insufficient evidence to demonstrate that evidence‐based nursing is a single construct or process that can be distinguished from its concomitants. The term adds little more to the existing long standing traditions of quality assurance and research‐based practice. Nurses must avoid the inefficiency brought about by the `intense enthusiasm followed by sad disenchantment' that has been associated with other attempts to introduce innovation in health care delivery ( 11 ).Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Symbolic interactionism as a theoretical perspective for multiple method researchJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2001
- The development of evidence‐based nursingJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1999
- EditorialThe American Journal of Medicine, 1998
- The theory‐practice gap in nursing: from research‐based practice to practitioner‐based researchJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1998
- Problems in the “Evidence” of “Evidence-Based Medicine”The American Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn'tBMJ, 1996
- Evidence based medicine: an approach to clinical problem-solvingBMJ, 1995
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN NURSINGJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1992
- Putting nursing research findings into practice: research utilization as an aspect of the management of change*Journal of Advanced Nursing, 1990