Cost effectiveness of mammography screening for Chinese women
Open Access
- 2 July 2007
- Vol. 110 (4) , 885-895
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22848
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Although the cost effectiveness of screening mammography in most western developed populations has been accepted, it may not apply to Chinese women, who have a much lower breast cancer incidence. The authors estimated the cost effectiveness of biennial mammography in Hong Kong Chinese women to inform evidence-based screening policies. METHODS. For the current study, a state-transition Markov model was developed to simulate mammography screening, breast cancer diagnosis, and treatment in a hypothetical cohort of Chinese women. The benefit of mammography was modeled by assuming a stage shift, in which cancers in screened women were more likely to be diagnosed at an earlier disease stage. The authors compared costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) saved, and life years saved (LYS) for 5 screening strategies. RESULTS. Biennial screening resulted in a gain in life expectancy ranging from 4.3 days to 9.4 days compared with no screening at an incremental cost of from US$1166 to US$2425 per woman. The least costly, nondominated screening option was screening from ages 40 years to 69 years, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$61,600 per QALY saved or US$64,400 per LYS compared with no screening. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, the probability of the ICER being below a threshold of US$50,000 per QALY (LYS) was 15.3% (14.6%). CONCLUSIONS. The current results suggested that mammography for Hong Kong Chinese women currently may not be cost effective based on the arbitrary threshold of US$50,000 per QALY. However, clinicians must remain vigilant and periodically should revisit the question of population screening: Disease rates in China have been increasing because of westernization and socioeconomic development. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of Screening and Adjuvant Therapy on Mortality from Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- The Cost-Effectiveness of Screening Programs Using Single and Multiple Birth Cohort Simulations: A Comparison Using a Model of Cervical CancerMedical Decision Making, 2004
- Benefits and Costs of Interventions to Improve Breast Cancer Outcomes in African American WomenJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- On the efficacy of screening for breast cancerInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2004
- Does NICE have a cost‐effectiveness threshold and what other factors influence its decisions? A binary choice analysisHealth Economics, 2004
- Screening for breast cancer with mammographyThe Lancet, 2001
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis and the Consistency of Decision MakingPharmacoEconomics, 2001
- Representing Both First- and Second-order Uncertainties by Monte Carlo Simulation for Groups of PatientsMedical Decision Making, 2000
- 14 years of follow-up from the Edinburgh randomised trial of breast-cancer screeningThe Lancet, 1999
- EVALUATING THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF CLINICAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH MEASURESAnnual Review of Public Health, 1998