After 9/11
- 1 April 2005
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Conflict Resolution
- Vol. 49 (2) , 259-277
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002704272864
Abstract
Using time-series procedures, the authors investigate whether transnational terrorism changed following 9/11 and the subsequent U.S.-led “war on terror.” Perhaps surprising, little has changed in the time series of overall incidents and most of its component series. When 9/11 is prejudged as a break date, the authors find that logistically complex hostage-taking events have fallen as a proportion of all events, while logistically simple, but deadly, bombings have increased as a proportion of deadly incidents. These results hold when they apply the Bai-Perron procedure in which structural breaks are data identified. This procedure locates earlier breaks in the mid-1970s and 1990s. Reasonable out-of-sample forecasts are possible if structural breaks are incorporated fairly rapidly into the model.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- CounterterrorismJournal of Conflict Resolution, 2005
- Collective Action and Transnational TerrorismThe World Economy, 2003
- Computation and analysis of multiple structural change modelsJournal of Applied Econometrics, 2002
- Is Transnational Terrorism Becoming More Threatening?Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2000
- Estimating and Testing Linear Models with Multiple Structural ChangesEconometrica, 1998
- The confluence of international and domestic trends in terrorismTerrorism and Political Violence, 1997
- The Effectiveness of Antiterrorism Policies: A Vector-Autoregression-Intervention AnalysisAmerican Political Science Review, 1993
- The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root HypothesisEconometrica, 1989
- A Theoretical Analysis of Transnational TerrorismAmerican Political Science Review, 1983
- An Economic Study of U. S. Aircraft Hijacking, 1961-1976The Journal of Law and Economics, 1978