Adherence to Antihypertensive Therapy With Fixed‐Dose Amlodipine Besylate/Benazepril HCl Versus Comparable Component‐Based Therapy
Open Access
- 1 November 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Congestive Heart Failure
- Vol. 9 (6) , 324-332
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-5299.2003.03269.x
Abstract
Adhering to medication regimens has the potential to significantly improve clinical outcomes for persons with high blood pressure. A patient‐related factor likely to affect adherence to treatment is the convenience of the prescribed drug regimen. The authors hypothesized that medication adherence would be superior and cost benefits would accrue in subjects who receive a once‐daily, single‐capsule, fixed‐dose combination product for blood pressure control, compared with subjects who receive a similar regimen of separate components. A managed care organization that provides benefits for members enrolled in various health plans provided the data for this retrospective analysis. The database was used to assess medication adherence patterns for two groups of hypertensive subjects. Group 1 included subjects who had been prescribed the single‐capsule, fixed‐dose combination of amlodipine besylate/benazepril HCl. Group 2 comprised subjects who had been prescribed a regimen including an angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor and a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker as separate drugs. Adherence was measured by the medication possession ratio, and medical resource utilization by the two groups was assessed during the study period. Group 1 (n=2754) and Group 2 (n=2978) were balanced with regard to age (mean, 53 years; range, 18–64 years) and sex (men, 50%; women, 50%). The overall medication possession ratio for Group 1 was significantly higher than that for Group 2 (80.8% vs. 73.8%; p<0.001). The average annual cost of cardiovascular‐related care per subject was significantly lower in Group 1 compared with Group 2 (p<0.001). Subjects receiving the once‐daily, single‐capsule, fixed‐dose combination of amlodipine/benazepril HCl demonstrated significantly better medication adherence and required fewer medical resources than did subjects receiving an angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor and a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker as separate components.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validity of Information on Comorbidity Derived From ICD-9-CCM Administrative DataMedical Care, 2002
- Rationale for Fixed-Dose Combinations in the Treatment of HypertensionDrugs, 2002
- Once-daily treatment of patients with hypertension: a placebo-controlled study of amlodipine and benazepril vs amlodipine or benazepril aloneJournal of Human Hypertension, 2001
- Effects of Blood Pressure Control on Progressive Renal Disease in Blacks and WhitesHypertension, 1997
- The assessment of refill compliance using pharmacy records: Methods, validity, and applicationsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1997
- Treatment of patients with essential hypertension: amlodipine 5 mg/benazepril 20 mg compared with amlodipine 5 mg, benazepril 20 mg, and placeboClinical Therapeutics, 1996
- The Costs of Interrupting Antihypertensive Drug Therapy in a Medicaid PopulationMedical Care, 1994
- Medical care and cost outcomes after pentoxifylline treatment for peripheral arterial diseaseArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1992
- Underutilization of Antihypertensive Drugs and Associated HospitalizationMedical Care, 1989
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987