Effects on Lung Function, Symptoms, and Bronchial Hyperreactivity of Low-Dose Inhaled Beclomethasone Dipropionate Given with HFA-134a or CFC Propellant
- 1 December 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Journal of Aerosol Medicine
- Vol. 15 (4) , 407-414
- https://doi.org/10.1089/08942680260473489
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of BDP 200 μg bid via metered dose inhaler, using HFA-134a (Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., Parma, Italy) versus CFC (Becotide™, Allen & Hanburys, U.K.) as a propellant. 172 adult patients (86 in each group) with stable mild persistent asthma who completed a 7-day run-in period were randomized to receive a 6-week treatment in a double-blind, double dummy, parallel-group design; 164 patients completed the study. Morning and evening PEFR, use of rescue salbutamol, number of day-time and night-time asthma attacks, number of night-time awakenings and clinical symptoms were recorded daily on a diary card. Pulmonary function tests (FEV1, FVC, PEFR, and MEF50) were measured at the clinic before and after the 1-week run-in period, and after 3 and 6 weeks of treatment. A challenge test with inhaled methacholine was completed at baseline and at the end of the treatment period to assess potential bronchial hyper-reactivity in a subgroup of subjects (n = 65; 34 HFA, 31 CFC). In accordance with asthma of mild severity (FEV1 predicted over 90% in both groups), a small improvement in lung function compared to baseline was seen for both treatments, significantly for FEV1 in BDP HFA and MEF50 in both groups. The two formulations of BDP had similar efficacy for the primary outcome variable morning PEFR (ITT population mean difference 5.8 L/min; C.I. -4.9 to +16.5) as well as for the secondary outcomes of evening PEFR and clinic FEV1. There were small improvements in methacholine PD20 and PC20 in both groups, with no significant difference between treatments. A total of 22 and 19 drug-related adverse events were reported in the BDP HFA and CFC groups, respectively; most events were of seasonal nature or were local effects due to the use of inhaled corticosteroids. It can be concluded that the newly developed formulation of BDP given via HFA-134a seems to provide similar asthma control, compared with the same low daily dose of the active drug delivered via CFC. Further studies are needed using higher doses in moderate to severe asthma to confirm these preliminary findings.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efficacy of HFA-beclomethasone dipropionate extra-fine aerosol (800 μ g day−1) versus HFA-fluticasone propionate (1000 μ g day−1) in patients with asthmaRespiratory Medicine, 2001
- Clinical efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate 250 $mu;g twice daily administered via a HFA 134a pressurized metered dose inhaler to patients with mild to moderate asthmaRespiratory Medicine, 2000
- Les détresses respiratoires dans les services d'accueil et d'urgences pédiatriques Epidemiologie et critères d'évaluationArchives de Pédiatrie, 2000
- Twenty-eight-day Double-blind Safety Study of an HFA-134a Inhalation Aerosol System in Healthy SubjectsJournal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 1996
- An overview of the toxicology of HFA-134a (1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane)Human & Experimental Toxicology, 1995
- CFCs, their Replacements, and the Ozone LayerJournal of Aerosol Medicine, 1995
- The Montreal Protocol and Essential Use ExemptionsJournal of Aerosol Medicine, 1995
- Safety of PropellantsJournal of Aerosol Medicine, 1995
- Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flowsEuropean Respiratory Journal, 1993
- Rapid method for measurement of bronchial responsiveness.Thorax, 1983