The Relationship Between EAP and EABR Thresholds and Levels Used to Program the Nucleus 24 Speech Processor: Data from Adults
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Ear & Hearing
- Vol. 21 (2) , 151-163
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200004000-00009
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between electrically evoked whole nerve action potential (EAP) and electrical auditory brain stem response (EABR) thresholds and MAP threshold (T-level) and maximum comfort level (C-level) for subjects who use the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Forty-four adult Nucleus 24 cochlear implant users participated in this study. EAP thresholds were recorded using the Neural Response Telemetry System developed by Cochlear Corporation. EABR thresholds were measured for a subset of 14 subjects using standard evoked potential techniques. These physiologic thresholds were collected on a set of five electrodes spaced across the cochlea, and were then compared with behavioral measures of T-level and C-level used to program the speech processor. EAP thresholds were correlated with MAP T- and C-levels; however, the correlation was not strong. A technique for improving the correlation by combining measures of T- and C-levels made on one electrode with the EAP thresholds was presented. Correlations between predicted and measured T- and C-levels using this technique were 0.83 and 0.77, respectively. Similar results were obtained using the EABR thresholds for a smaller set of subjects. In general, EABR thresholds were recorded at levels that were approximately 4.7 programming units lower than EAP thresholds. Either EAP or EABR thresholds can be used in combination with a limited amount of behavioral information to predict MAP T- and C-levels with reasonable accuracy.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Summary of Results Using the Nucleus CI24M Implant to Record the Electrically Evoked Compound Action PotentialEar & Hearing, 1999
- Electrically Evoked Whole Nerve Action Potentials in Ineraid Cochlear Implant Users: Responses to Different Stimulating Electrode Configurations and Comparison to Psychophysical ResponsesJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1996
- Recurrent fibrovascular polyp of the esophagusAmerican Journal of Otolaryngology, 1995
- Cochlear Implant Generated Surface PotentialsEar & Hearing, 1994
- Intraoperative and Postoperative Electrically Evoked Auditory Brain Stem Responses in Nucleus Cochlear Implant UsersEar & Hearing, 1994
- Application of Intraoperative Recordings of Electrically Evoked ABRs in a Paediatric Cochlear Implant ProgrammePublished by S. Karger AG ,1992
- Prediction of Behavioral Threshold and Comfort Values for Nucleus 22-Channel Implant Patients from Electrical Auditory Brain Stem Response Test ResultsAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 1991
- Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: Data from human cochlear implant usersThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1990
- Long‐Term effects of multichannel cochlear implant usageThe Laryngoscope, 1986
- Human Acoustic Nerve Action Potential Recordings from the Tympanic Membrane Without AnesthesiaActa Oto-Laryngologica, 1972