Perceived risk and tampering with nature
- 1 October 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Risk Research
- Vol. 3 (4) , 353-367
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870050132568
Abstract
It is proposed that risk perception is partly driven by notions of what is seen as unnatural and immoral activities of modern technology, e.g. nuclear technology. The dimension of tampering with nature is found, in two large-scale survey studies of the general public and, in one case, of politicians involved in the environmental field, to be an important predictor of perceived risk. In one study, the perceived risk of nuclear waste was investigated, and in the other the perceived risk of a potential nuclear disaster of the Chernobyl kind. It was found that tampering with nature was a much stronger predictor of perceived risk than the traditional psychometric model dimensions, and that it absorbed most or all of the predictive power of these dimensions when entered in a common regression equation. Policy implications of these findings are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Factors in Risk PerceptionRisk Analysis, 2000
- Risk perception and social anthropology: Critique of cultural theory*Ethnos, 1996
- Stigma models: Testing hypotheses of how images of Nevada are acquired and values are attached to themPublished by Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) ,1994
- Responding to Community OutragePublished by American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) ,1993
- Hazard versus Outrage in the Public Perception of RiskPublished by Springer Nature ,1989