Language as shaped by the brain
Top Cited Papers
- 1 October 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Vol. 31 (5) , 489-509
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x08004998
Abstract
It is widely assumed that human learning and the structure of human languages are intimately related. This relationship is frequently suggested to derive from a language-specific biological endowment, which encodes universal, but communicatively arbitrary, principles of language structure (a Universal Grammar or UG). How might such a UG have evolved? We argue that UG could not have arisen either by biological adaptation or non-adaptationist genetic processes, resulting in alogical problem of language evolution. Specifically, as the processes of language change are much more rapid than processes of genetic change, language constitutes a “moving target” both over time and across different human populations, and, hence, cannot provide a stable environment to which language genes could have adapted. We conclude that a biologically determined UG is not evolutionarily viable. Instead, the original motivation for UG – the mesh between learners and languages – arises because language has been shaped to fit the human brain, rather than vice versa. Following Darwin, we view language itself as a complex and interdependent “organism,” which evolves under selectional pressures from human learning and processing mechanisms. That is, languages themselves are shaped by severe selectional pressure from each generation of language users and learners. This suggests that apparently arbitrary aspects of linguistic structure may result from general learning and processing biases deriving from the structure of thought processes, perceptuo-motor factors, cognitive limitations, and pragmatics.Keywords
This publication has 184 references indexed in Scilit:
- Linguistic tone is related to the population frequency of the adaptive haplogroups of two brain size genes,ASPMandMicrocephalinProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
- Innateness and culture in the evolution of languageProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
- Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehensionProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006
- The evolution of vocabularyJournal of Theoretical Biology, 2004
- Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European originNature, 2003
- The Emergence of IntelligenceScientific American, 1994
- Four analogies between biological and cultural/linguistic evolutionJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1991
- The inheritance of acquired epigenetic variationsJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1989
- Cross-species gene transfer; implications for a new theory of evolutionJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1985
- The genetical evolution of social behaviour. IJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1964