Retrospective Review of the Incidence of Cytomegalovirus Infection and Disease After Liver Transplantation in Pediatric Patients: Comparison of Prophylactic Oral Ganciclovir and Oral Valganciclovir
Open Access
- 5 December 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Liver Transplantation
- Vol. 18 (3) , 347-354
- https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.22471
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common viral infection after solid organ transplantation (SOT). Safe and effective prophylactic regimens that decrease its incidence after SOT are essential for long-term graft survival. Although valganciclovir is not Food and Drug Administration–approved for CMV prophylaxis in liver transplant recipients, postmarketing studies have shown valganciclovir to be as effective as ganciclovir in high-risk adult patients undergoing SOT. Currently, data are lacking for pediatric liver transplantation. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of valganciclovir and ganciclovir for CMV infection prophylaxis in pediatric liver transplant recipients. This was a retrospective study of 56 pediatric liver transplant recipients who were prescribed either oral ganciclovir (n = 37) or valganciclovir (n = 19). Patients were followed until 200 days after transplantation or death. The primary outcome measure compared the rates of early-onset CMV infection and CMV disease in the 2 medication groups. Secondary outcome measures identified patient-specific factors that contributed to CMV acquisition and the incidence of late-onset CMV infection or disease. The rates of adverse drug effects and discontinuation were also evaluated. Early-onset CMV disease was documented in 0% of valganciclovir patients and in 5.4% of ganciclovir patients (P = 0.54). There were no statistically significant differences in the secondary outcomes. An increased incidence of late-onset CMV disease was seen in the valganciclovir group versus the ganciclovir group (22.2% versus 8.1%, P = 0.23). No differences in adverse events were reported. In conclusion, no statistically significant differences were found in the incidence of CMV infection or disease between patients receiving oral valganciclovir and patients receiving oral ganciclovir. Liver Transpl 18:347–354, 2012. © 2012 AASLD.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prevention of Posttransplant Cytomegalovirus Disease and Related Outcomes with Valganciclovir: A Systematic ReviewAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2008
- Valganciclovir as Treatment for Cytomegalovirus Disease in Solid Organ Transplant RecipientsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2008
- A Survey of CMV Prevention Strategies After Liver TransplantationAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2007
- Impact of Valganciclovir Prophylaxis on the Development of Severe Late-Cytomegalovirus Disease in High-Risk Solid Organ Transplant RecipientsTransplantation Proceedings, 2007
- Does Valganciclovir Hydrochloride (Valcyte) Provide Effective Prophylaxis Against Cytomegalovirus Infection in Liver Transplant Recipients?Transplantation Proceedings, 2005
- Efficacy and Safety of Valganciclovir vs. Oral Ganciclovir for Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Disease in Solid Organ Transplant RecipientsAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2004
- Quantitative analysis of CMV DNA in children the first year after liver transplantationPediatric Transplantation, 2003
- Current Management Strategies for the Prevention and Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Pediatric Transplant RecipientsPediatric Drugs, 2002
- Valganciclovir Results in Improved Oral Absorption of Ganciclovir in Liver Transplant RecipientsAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2000
- GanciclovirDrugs, 1998