Liberalism and Communitarianism: A Misconceived Debate
- 1 June 1992
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Political Studies
- Vol. 40 (2) , 273-289
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1992.tb01384.x
Abstract
This article considers the criticisms made of liberal political thought by communitarians in the 1980s. It aims to clarify the communitarian critique and evaluate the force of communitarian criticisms of liberalism. It argues that communitarians advance three different types of claim: descriptive claims which stress that people are social beings; normative claims which celebrate the value of community and solidarity, and a meta-ethical claim emphasizing that political principles should mirror ‘shared understandings’. This article argues that the descriptive and normative claims espoused by communitarians are judged to be plausible but are accepted by liberals, and that the meta-ethical thesis is untenable and liberals are right to eschew it.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sandel's Critique of the Primacy of Justice: A Liberal RejoinderBritish Journal of Political Science, 1991
- Liberal Individualism and Liberal NeutralityEthics, 1989
- Particular Values and Critical MoralityCalifornia Law Review, 1989
- Dworkin's Unfinished TaskCalifornia Law Review, 1989
- Moral Arguments and Social ContextsThe Journal of Philosophy, 1983
- Fairness to GoodnessThe Philosophical Review, 1975