Shaping the Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Human Motor Cortex
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physiological Society in Journal of Neurophysiology
- Vol. 97 (4) , 3109-3117
- https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01312.2006
Abstract
Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS) induces stimulation polarity-dependent neuroplastic excitability shifts in the human brain. Because it accomplishes long-lasting effects and its application is simple, it is used increasingly. However, one drawback is its low focality, caused by 1) the large stimulation electrode and 2) the functionally effective reference electrode, which is also situated on the scalp. We aimed to increase the focality of tDCS, which might improve the interpretation of the functional effects of stimulation because it will restrict its effects to more clearly defined cortical areas. Moreover, it will avoid unwanted reversed effects of tDCS under the reference electrode, which is of special importance in clinical settings, when a homogeneous shift of cortical excitability is needed. Because current density (current strength/electrode size) determines the efficacy of tDCS, increased focality should be accomplished by 1) reducing stimulation electrode size, but keeping current density constant; or 2) increasing reference electrode size under constant current strength. We tested these hypotheses for motor cortex tDCS. The results show that reducing the size of the motor cortex DC-stimulation electrode focalized the respective tDCS-induced excitability changes. Increasing the size of the frontopolar reference electrode rendered stimulation over this cortex functionally inefficient, but did not compromise the tDCS-generated motor cortical excitability shifts. Thus tDCS-generated modulations of cortical excitability can be focused by reducing the size of the stimulation electrode and by increasing the size of the reference electrode. For future applications of tDCS, such paradigms may help to achieve more selective tDCS effects.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- A sham-controlled, phase II trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of central pain in traumatic spinal cord injuryPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2006
- A Controlled Clinical Trial of Cathodal DC Polarization in Patients with Refractory EpilepsyEpilepsia, 2006
- How does transcranial DC stimulation of the primary motor cortex alter regional neuronal activity in the human brain?European Journal of Neuroscience, 2005
- Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic strokeBrain, 2005
- Facilitation of visuo‐motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor and extrastriate visual areas in humansEuropean Journal of Neuroscience, 2004
- Effect of transcranial DC sensorimotor cortex stimulation on somatosensory evoked potentials in humansClinical Neurophysiology, 2004
- Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulationThe Journal of Physiology, 2000
- A Neostriatal Habit Learning System in HumansScience, 1996
- Considerations for safety in the use of extracranial stimulation for motor evoked potentialsNeurosurgery, 1987
- Mental Changes Resulting from the Passage of Small Direct Currents Through the Human BrainThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1964