The impact of impacts and the nature of nature
- 19 August 1986
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Eos
- Vol. 67 (33) , 633-637
- https://doi.org/10.1029/eo067i033p00633
Abstract
Six years have passed since L.W. Alvarez and his colleagues presented evidence suggesting that a 10‐km asteroid had struck the earth 65 million years ago and created a global dust cloud that suppressed photosynthesis and led to the extinctions associated with the Cretaceous/Tertiary (K/T) boundary [Alvarez et al., 1980]. Their evidence was anomalous amounts of iridium and other siderophile elements at K/T sections in Italy, Denmark, and New Zealand. Since then, the single asteroid impact hypothesis has evolved into a hypothesis of periodic comet showers, each shower consisting of several cometary impacts over a 1–2‐million‐yr period, to explain not only the K/T but the Eocene/Oligocene (E/O) as well as other extinction events recorded throughout the Phanerozoic [Davis et al., 1984; Hut et al., 1985].Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Biochronology and paleoclimatic implications of Middle Eocene to Oligocene planktic foraminiferal faunasPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- A sequence of events across the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundaryPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Patterns of family extinction depend on definition and geological timescaleNature, 1985
- Terrestrial impactors at geological boundary events: comets or asteroids?Nature, 1985
- Dinasour extinction and volcanic activityEos, 1985
- Periodicity of Extinctions in the Geologic Past: Deterministic Versus Stochastic ExplanationsScience, 1984
- Extinction of species by periodic comet showersNature, 1984
- A resetting of Phanerozoic community evolutionNature, 1984
- The Cretaceous-Tertiary TransitionScience, 1983
- Land plant evidence compatible with gradual, not catastrophic, change at the end of the CretaceousNature, 1981