US NAT yield: where are we after 2 years?
- 1 August 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Transfusion Medicine
- Vol. 12 (4) , 243-253
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3148.2002.00387.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why is there such difficulty in defining the natural history of hepatitis C?Transfusion, 2000
- NAT and blood safety: what is the paradigm?Transfusion, 2000
- Nucleic acid amplification testing of blood donors fortransfusion‐transmitted infectious diseasesTransfusion, 2000
- TRANSFUSION in the New YearTransfusion, 2000
- Feasibility and efficacy of routine PCR screening of blood donations for hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B virus, and HIV-1 in a blood-bank settingThe Lancet, 1999
- American Association of Blood Banks 50th annual meeting. Denver, Colorado, October 18–22, 1997. AbstractsTransfusion, 1997
- The incidence/window period model and its use to assess the risk of transfusion-transmitted human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus infectionTransfusion Medicine Reviews, 1997
- The Risk of Transfusion-Transmitted Viral InfectionsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Declining value of alanine aminotransferase in screening of blood donors to prevent posttransfusion hepatitis B and C virus infection. The Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor StudyTransfusion, 1995
- Application of Six Hepatitis C Virus Genotyping Systems to Sera from Chronic Hepatitis C Patients in the United StatesThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1995