Preventive Pacemaking
- 15 July 1982
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 307 (3) , 180-181
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198207153070309
Abstract
Although pacemakers have been used clinically for almost 25 years,1 we still do not know in all cases just when to install them. No physician would hesitate to prescribe a permanent pacemaker for a patient with syncope and documented third-degree atrioventricular block. The device will prevent fainting, provide a more physiologic heart rate, and prolong life. But must one wait until a potentially fatal event such as syncope occurs to take definite action?When atrioventricular block develops, some form of heart disease has destroyed the ability of the specialized conducting system to transmit electrical impulses through the atrioventricular node, the . . .Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Natural History of High-Risk Bundle-Branch BlockNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Case 1-1982: Atrioventricular Heart BlockNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Significance of the HV interval in 517 patients with chronic bifascicular block.Circulation, 1981
- Recollections—1958–1961Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1981
- Clinical treatment of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias with the automatic implantable defibrillatorAmerican Heart Journal, 1981
- Cardiac ElectrophysiologyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Atrioventricular BlockNew England Journal of Medicine, 1975
- Syncope in Patients with Chronic Bifascicular BlockAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1974