Coincidence-anticipation accuracy across the life span
- 28 September 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Experimental Aging Research
- Vol. 6 (5) , 451-462
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03610738008258380
Abstract
Improvement in response speed through young adulthood and decline in older adulthood has been consistently demonstrated. There is indication of a similar trend in coincidence-anticipation accuracy, wherein the performer predicts the arrival of a moving stimulus at a target point, although performance appears to plateau earlier and performance by older adults has not been studied. Four age groups, 7–9, 11–13, 18–32, and 60–75 years, were observed on a coincidence-anticipation task requiring a thumb-press response and on a maximal response-time task. Speeds of the sequential-light stimulus of the former were 2 through 5 MPH. While findings confirmed age trend in response speed, only the youngest children performed significantly poorer than the others in coincidence-anticipation accuracy. More variable or less accurate performance at extreme stimulus speeds characterized this youngest group. A more sedentary group of adults, 64 to 86 years, was tested in a follow-up experiment. The analysis indicated that older adults showed little directional bias but performed less accurately and more variably than young adults.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Aging and the maintaining of preparationExperimental Aging Research, 1980
- Practice Effects on Fractionated Response Time Related to Age and Activity LevelJournal of Motor Behavior, 1978
- Age, isometric knee extension strength, and fractionated resisted response timeExperimental Aging Research, 1978
- Eye Movements During Coincidence-Anticipation PerformanceJournal of Motor Behavior, 1977
- Timing and AnticipationJournal of Motor Behavior, 1977
- Reaction and Movement Time as a Function of age and Physical Activity LevelJournal of Gerontology, 1975